dovetail.
Let’s talk

PROJECT-AWARE AI

Intelligence that
gets the particulars.

Read the documents together. Understand the disagreement. Find the missing instruction. Keep the designer in charge.

Explore the sample review

THE INTELLIGENCE IN THE DETAILS

Not another answer.
A better next decision.

AI that reads across your project context, explains what needs attention, and prepares the next step for a person to approve.

Dovetail intelligenceEXAMPLE PROJECT · NORTHLINE RESIDENCE

MORE CONTEXT. MORE USEFUL REASONING.

A drawing alone
isn’t the whole story.

Useful specification intelligence joins the design intent to product information, project standards, supplier updates, and the latest approved decision.

PRODUCT SHEETModel, dimensions, finish, installation notes
PROJECT STANDARDRoom template, required fields, preferred detail
COMMUNICATIONClient request, supplier response, revision discussion
APPROVAL RECORDDecision, owner, date, scope

Read across.
Reason carefully.

Long-context language and multimodal analysis connect what is stated, what conflicts, and what still needs to be asked.

REVIEWABLE OUTPUT

A useful next step.
Not a confident guess.

  • Finding and supporting source
  • Affected room and specification
  • Missing or contradictory information
  • Suggested next check and owner
  • Draft update awaiting approval

THE WORK AI CAN TAKE ON

From reading
to reasoning.

Document-to-spec extraction

Turn product sheets, selection schedules, and supplier notes into candidate fields. Preserve the source and ask for review where the document is incomplete.

Completeness and conflict review

Check required room fields, compare finish codes and dimensions across records, and separate a missing answer from an actual contradiction.

Substitution analysis

Compare an alternative against the approved intent: dimensions, material, finish, stated lead time, and documented price. Highlight unknown compatibility rather than assuming equivalence.

Change-impact reasoning

Trace a proposed change into related specifications, procurement questions, installation notes, approval needs, and downstream handoffs.

Project knowledge and retrieval

Find relevant past details and office standards. Keep historical information separate from current manufacturer data and project-specific approval.

Decision and task preparation

Prepare a concise review brief, an RFI draft, a supplier question, or a structured follow-up. Important updates remain reviewable before issue.

AN ALTERNATIVE IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY AN EQUIVALENT

Compare beyond
the product photo.

Try an illustrative fixture comparison. A cheaper price or earlier date does not answer every design, procurement or installation question.

APPROVED INTENT / LT-03

Linear pendant.
Warm brass.

48-inch body, 2700K light output and a $780 unit allowance. Ceiling support and the control system still need project-specific review.

Example figures only. Not a live supplier quote.

REVIEW, BEFORE REPLACEMENT

Price difference versus allowance

NEXT QUESTION

What this comparison does—and does not—establish

Line-item price difference = (example unit price − $780 allowance) × quantity. Tax, shipping, installation and accessory costs are excluded. Product descriptions and lead times are authored examples, not availability checks. Finish wording does not establish a visual match; matching dimensions do not establish electrical or structural compatibility. A responsible person must review the actual manufacturer documents before approving a substitution.

WHY THE PROJECT CONTEXT MATTERS

The difficult part
is connecting the evidence.

A useful AI review reads across related records, distinguishes their authority and turns the result into a checkable action—not a polished guess.

01

Understand the instruction

A supplier sheet may contain several models, dimensions and finishes. Identify which variant the project actually selected before extracting a number. Retain units and source locations; flag ambiguous tables instead of filling the gap.

Input: technical sheets, selected variant and room context.Output: candidate specification fields with unresolved questions.
02

Reconcile disagreement

A schedule, an email and an approved selection can describe different moments in a project. Compare dates, revisions and decision states rather than assuming the latest message automatically overrides the approved record.

Input: conflicting records, dates and approval history.Output: a conflict brief showing both values and the decision required.
03

Reason through dependencies

A thicker countertop can affect edge details, clearance and fabrication assumptions. A fixture change can affect mounting and control-system questions. Trace related items without claiming an engineering conclusion.

Input: proposed change, linked selections and installation notes.Output: affected-item list, follow-up questions and responsible disciplines.
04

Prepare structured work

Turn a finding into an RFI draft, an issue-list entry or a decision brief. Separate the observation, supporting evidence, suggested action and approval requirement so the result can enter an accountable workflow.

Input: reviewed findings and the team’s handoff format.Output: editable drafts, not silently issued instructions.

INTELLIGENCE WITH BOUNDARIES

The system can advise.
Your team decides.

AI should make uncertainty easier to see, not easier to overlook.

  • Inspect the record behind the finding.
  • Validate numbers with deterministic checks.
  • Keep approvals and issued versions explicit.
  • Do not infer code compliance or installation suitability.
  • Scope access, retention, and integrations before connecting data.
Talk through your requirements

DESIGN FORWARD. BUILD WITH CLARITY.

Leave nothing
to interpretation.

Bring us a room, a spec sheet, or a process you want to improve.
Let’s talk about what better coordination could look like.

Start a conversation